Talk:Change order

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Description edit

This description is just plain awful.

Rich I. esq

Assessment comment edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Change order/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)Press [show] to view →
The one construction delivery method that helps to reduce or even eliminate the change order philosophy is Job Order Contracting (JOC). Under a successful JOC program, the owner and the contractor work together (sometimes along with the A/E firm and end user), to jointly scope the project. By doing this, all parties fully understand the expectations of the end result. Obviously 100% no changes orders is difficult to assert due to unforeseen situations, especially for renovation projects when previous plans aren't available or it is an older structure that may have had previous unknown alterations. Further there is no incentive for the contractor to look for change order opportunities after the start of the project, since they have provided the owner a firm, fixed, lump-sum price for the project based on the joint scope and any contractor initiated change orders (not withstanding unforeseen circumstances) will be at the expense of the contractor not the owner. Performance Based Construction (talk) 16:02, 10 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 16:02, 10 April 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 11:15, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Change order. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:48, 19 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Change order. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:11, 7 January 2018 (UTC)Reply