Talk:Chandni (film)

Latest comment: 2 years ago by AnomieBOT in topic Orphaned references in Chandni (film)

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chandni. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:22, 19 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

 N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

I have found the correct links and fixed them on the Article page. Msoul13 (talk) 03:38, 7 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chandni. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:35, 20 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in Chandni (film) edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Chandni (film)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Budget":

  • From Hum Aapke Hain Koun..!: Bamzai, Kaveree (7 July 2003). "Sooraj Barjatya: Bollywood's most profitable filmmaker steps out of the comfort zone". India Today. Archived from the original on 2 December 2013. Retrieved 12 February 2014.
  • From Aditya Chopra: "Ek Tha Tiger: It's Salman's show all the way". IBNLive.com. Archived from the original on 18 August 2012. Retrieved 16 August 2012.
  • From Maine Pyar Kiya: Bamzai, Kaveree (7 July 2003). "Sooraj Barjatya: Bollywood's most profitable filmmaker steps out of the comfort zone". India Today. India Today Group. Archived from the original on 2 December 2013. Retrieved 24 August 2014.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 13:20, 24 March 2022 (UTC)Reply