Talk:Chandelure

Latest comment: 11 days ago by AirshipJungleman29 in topic Did you know nomination

GA Review edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Chandelure/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: NegativeMP1 (talk · contribs) 21:15, 8 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Soon. I have very limited knowledge of Pokémon, so when I review this article, bear with me. λ NegativeMP1 21:15, 8 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Yeah that's fine. Thanks for taking this nomination! PrimalMustelid (talk) 13:48, 9 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Still intend on reviewing this, gonna need a little bit longer though. λ NegativeMP1 06:28, 17 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Review edit

None of the quickfail criteria were met, so skipping straight to the actual review.

Prose edit

  • "They were created by Ken Sugimori and were introduced in the video games Pokémon Black and White." → "Designed by Ken Sugimori, they were introduced in the video games Pokémon Black and White."
  • Link first prose instance of Ken Sugimori
  • Change infobox caption to "Promotional artwork"
    • Well, I am following other Pokémon species pages for Wikipedia, and they go by "[Pokémon] artwork by Ken Sugimori." Is that still problematic? PrimalMustelid (talk) 23:39, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • Any more development information on the species?
    • Yeah that's it, the Pokémon franchise isn't exactly known for covering conceptions of most Pokémon. PrimalMustelid (talk) 23:39, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • There are two different methods of stating "Fire and Ghost type" in the article, with one having a "-" after fire. Use one or the other for consistency.
  • You mention lore in the lead and reception sections, yet don't give a brief overview of the lore of the species. If its restricted to a brief overview, it should be covered by WP:PLOTCITE and not require a citation.
  • "Chandelure also made an appearance in several Pokémon anime episodes" italicize the name of the anime.
  • The paragraph of some outlets criticizing the species needs to be extended. You mention in the lead the species was met with mixed reception, yet don't elaborate on how exactly it was mixed.

Media edit

Only one image is used in the whole article, and it's the species itself. Obviously a necessary image with justified fair use.

Sources edit

I'll do a spotcheck soon. Spot checked 11, 21, 36, and 39. They all seem to verify the content they are cited to, so pass on this end.

Final comments edit

Putting this on hold to give you time to address the comments posted above. λ NegativeMP1 01:33, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sure, I'll get to finishing the implementations of the review's suggestions in two days, thanks for reviewing! PrimalMustelid (talk) 01:41, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
NegativeMP1 And I addressed your suggestions so far, let me know if there's any lingering issues. PrimalMustelid (talk) 23:39, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination edit

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 10:59, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Improved to Good Article status by PrimalMustelid (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 6 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

PrimalMustelid (talk) 11:09, 20 March 2024 (UTC).Reply

  •   @PrimalMustelid: Recent GA. Length is satisfactory and no indication of copyvio, QPQ is done (just 1 required). Good to go, but before that I would propose a reword the original hook:
Juxlos (talk) 07:37, 21 March 2024 (UTC)Reply