Talk:Cerebral vasculitis

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Jfdwolff in topic PACNS

Sources

edit

There are a couple of reviews out there. Unfortunately the 1997 review is not free, and the 2000 review is rather brief (3 pages). Anything after 2000 is inaccessible to me. Perhaps the textbooks will offer some help. JFW | T@lk 06:13, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Even Orphanet has no information: link. JFW | T@lk 08:05, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
PMC 2170162 may get us somewhere. JFW | T@lk 08:12, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

PACNS

edit

.... seems to be the new name. doi::10.1136/practneurol-2015-001332 JFW | T@lk 11:45, 17 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

doi:10.1016/j.rdc.2017.06.001 is a more recent review. JFW | T@lk 16:13, 29 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cerebral vasculitis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:17, 18 November 2016 (UTC)Reply