Merger proposal edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result was merge from Compartmentalization (biology). -- U+003F? 08:06, 16 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

The subject matter of this article (cellular compartment) and the compartmentalization (biology) article largely overlap. The former article answers the question "what" while the later article concerns "why" and "how". It is somewhat artificial to split this subject into two articles. Furthermore, both are short stubs requiring expansion and this would be easier to do from one unified article compared to two fragmented articles. Boghog (talk) 20:52, 7 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

agreed, i think they should be combined Davebridges (talk) 23:07, 7 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Completely agree, lets merge it. Actually, even if not merged, the importance on the scales should be switched. Actually up to now, I understood the topic of compartmentalization (biology) slightly differently than how ERs etc are budding. I predominantly saw it as Cellular compartment - but name given maybe from the point of view of the concept, maybe from the evolutionary point of view (yes we already have endosymbiotic theory, so what much more to add?), so it would overlap even more. Compartment is somewhat different term than organelle, but pretty common and should be better elucidated. Reo + 11:02, 16 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:40, 22 January 2021 (UTC)Reply