Talk:Celier Xenon 4

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Celier Xenon 4 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Aviation: Aircraft / Rotorcraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the aircraft project.
	This article is supported by the rotorcraft project.

Malta Low‑importance

	Malta portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Malta, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Malta on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaltaWikipedia:WikiProject MaltaTemplate:WikiProject MaltaMalta articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

C-44 edit

Latest comment: 8 months ago5 comments2 people in discussion

I removed the C-44 as this is built by a different manufacturer and despite looking like a Xenon, there is nothing in the ref cited that indicates it is a Xenon variant. I think before we add more claims we really need to find a ref that explains the relationship between Celier and Argo. - Ahunt (talk) 13:15, 27 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

"The C-44 is t is manufactured in the European Union - Poland.

It is truly an engineering work of art, built on the legacy of the Xenon."

they don't mention if it is the Xenon 2 or 4 FSbiran (talk) 15:08, 27 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

built on the legacy of the Xenon does not really state that it is a Xenon variant. The wording is pretty vague. It is possible it is a new design was "inspired by" the previous design, a copy, or a derivative, or even just trying to connect to publicity for the previous model. Unless we have something more definitive it is not really clear it is a variant and thus should be in this article. I have no issues with a new article on the C-22, though, if there are third party refs on it to comply with WP:GNG. - Ahunt (talk) 15:17, 27 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUgzSniVEXE

interesting, but what is flyARGO now? FSbiran (talk) 21:41, 29 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Odd. The decal on the gyro says "FlyArgo Rotorcraft Center" in English, which makes it sound like a flying school. The aircraft has an "SP" registration, which is Poland, so I presume it was shot in Poland. More questions than answers. - Ahunt (talk) 21:59, 29 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic