Talk:Catriona Grant
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Catriona Grant article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 29 January 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
 | It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
WikiProject class rating edit
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 05:08, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Notability? Authorship? edit
Observing that the notability template has been in place over 18 months with no substantial revisions to this article, I suggest it be deleted for failing to demonstrate notability.
I have checked the sources cited and Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Reference 1-3 are not current on the web. Reference 4 quotes Ms Grant as a protestor but is otherwise substantially about other people. Reference 5 makes no mention of Ms Grant. References 6 and 7 appear to be blog posts by the subject. Reference 8 mentions Grant in passing alongside a large number of other people, again in a piece that is substantially not about her. Being a witness at Tommy Sheridan's trials could be usefully merged instead into the articles about the trials themselves.
In addition the creator of the article, ms medusa, seems to have a substantial overlap with Ms Grant's own interest and topics of preoccupation, suggesting the possibility this article may have been initiated by none other than the subject herself.
87.115.112.57 (talk) 15:01, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Catriona Grant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://arquivo.pt/wayback/20090725083904/http://www.scottishsocialistparty.org/swn/swn.html to http://www.scottishsocialistparty.org/swn/swn.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927213430/http://www.cpgb.org.uk/worker/361/sspsplit.html to http://www.cpgb.org.uk/worker/361/sspsplit.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930015605/http://www.cpgb.org.uk/worker/367/ismleavescwi.htm to http://www.cpgb.org.uk/worker/367/ismleavescwi.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:43, 1 August 2017 (UTC)