This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Abortion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Abortion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AbortionWikipedia:WikiProject AbortionTemplate:WikiProject AbortionAbortion articles
Latest comment: 15 years ago9 comments3 people in discussion
I added this page because it is an association that publishes journals that are referenced in Wikipedia. I did not know what the assoc was and was surprised that it had no Wiki-entry. It has many physician members and publishes journals, and is mentioned in other Wiki-pages. It needs a Wiki-page. period. History2007 (talk) 02:51, 30 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
There you go: [1], and [2] many hits on big newspapers via Google. Period. History2007 (talk) 02:58, 30 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Google isn't a way to directly ascertain notability, but if you have references from news hits and whatever why not include them in the first place? Ironholds (talk) 03:21, 30 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
I am busy now, may get to it later... You can add it if you have time. There are plenty. History2007 (talk) 03:28, 30 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
My point is why didn't you include them initially, it would've saved a lot of time. Ironholds (talk) 04:11, 30 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Ironholds, there's no reason to think that adding the sources initially would have saved any of History2007's time: it's the same level of work whether s/he does it this week or next. It might have saved your time, but that's not a strong argument in favor of History2007 doing extra work immediately. WhatamIdoing (talk) 04:50, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Ok, ok, ok. I hereby agree to refund exactly 10% of what I have been paid by Wikipedia this week. Where do I send the check? But seriously, the way these things work is that different people add things over time. I started the page on Matthias Stom with just one sentence because he had no entry, and suddenly others added to it. So one person starts, then many add: Wikipedia. History2007 (talk) 15:33, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Update: I eventually managed to add to the page. It is almost the end of Feb now, and no one else did anything, so I had to do it after all. History2007 (talk) 20:06, 22 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
