Talk:Catherine Stenbock
Latest comment: 1 month ago by ThaesOfereode in topic One source tag
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled edit
Is her birthday correct?--V7ndotcom elursrebmem 11:49, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
Inappropriate referencing format edit
Please see Talk:Princess Cecilia of Sweden#Reference format! --SergeWoodzing (talk) 06:17, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
One source tag edit
I believe this tag is not an improvement, not neccessary and clutters the top. Will revert again unless convinced. SergeWoodzing (talk) 19:02, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- @SergeWoodzing: I see, I thought the revert may have been done in error and attempted to revert; I meant no offense. I believe the one source tag fits best for the page, given that the page is reliant on one source for 59 of its 65 footnotes (over 90%). Also, given the incompleteness of the other two sources, I believed the tag made sense. I don't think two tags necessarily clutters the top, especially when they are clustered with the multiple issues tag. I believe this tag is appropriate, but I am willing to consider the converse. ThaesOfereode (talk) 19:18, 7 April 2024 (UTC)