Talk:Catherine Seipp

Updated information

Actually, she's a former columnist for The New York Press and Salon.com, if I'm not mistaken. Ruthfulbarbarity 19:46, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

I think she counts as notable since I looked her up here on purpose. She died, by the way.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Catherine Seipp. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070503013836/http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=Zjg0ZjZlNDExODg4YzFhYTM5YTU4NjlkNTVjOGY1OWU%3D to http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=Zjg0ZjZlNDExODg4YzFhYTM5YTU4NjlkNTVjOGY1OWU%3D
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100514155414/http://old.nationalreview.com/seipp/seipp-archive.asp to http://old.nationalreview.com/seipp/seipp-archive.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110811015214/http://old.nationalreview.com/seipp/seipp200604280608.asp to http://old.nationalreview.com/seipp/seipp200604280608.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:01, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

External links

There are twelve entries in the "External links". Three seems to be an acceptable number and of course, everyone has their favorite to add for four. The problem is that none is needed for article promotion.

• ELpoints #3) states: Links in the "External links" section should be kept to a minimum. A lack of external links or a small number of external links is not a reason to add external links.
• Linkfarm states: There is nothing wrong with adding one or more useful content-relevant links to the external links section of an article; however, excessive lists can dwarf articles and detract from the purpose of Wikipedia. On articles about topics with many fansites, for example, including a link to one major fansite may be appropriate.
• WP:ELMIN: Minimize the number of links. Trim links per above.-- Otr500 (talk) 06:29, 8 March 2023 (UTC)