Talk:Caterham Valley

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Adam37 in topic Untitled

Untitled edit

In WP:SURREY this is languishing at stub class. Yet if improved, most of its material would be duplicated from Caterham.

As a geographically barely separated ward from the one other shared by Caterham that only has approximately 10,000 people, not a historic ecclesiastical parish and as not all wards are notable in their own right,consensus tends to be towards successful conversion of it to a section of Caterham under the heading localities. Redundancy otherwise is a problem, instead focussing on what is notable and applicable to a whole settlement, not duplicating all of the necessary geographical content (this principle is set out in two sections of how to write about UK settlements). - Adam37 Talk 19:21, 15 October 2013 (UTC)Reply