Talk:Catch 21/GA1

Latest comment: 7 years ago by MWright96 in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 07:37, 18 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

I will have a look at this article. MWright96 (talk) 07:37, 18 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Infobox edit

Lead edit

  • Add the reception the show has received into the lead.

Main Game edit

  • The final part of the second paragraph is missing a reference.

Production edit

  • "with some episodes featuring celebrities with a common bond playing for charity." - with some episodes featuring celebrities with a common bond of playing for charity.

References edit

  • Reference 5 displays an 403 - Fordbidden Error message. Can it be archived?

Overall, very good work. Awaiting response on points. MWright96 (talk) 14:55, 18 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Done with everything, excepted I tweaked the sentence issue in the Production section further and found that ref 5 works fine for me. Maybe it's an issue related to the fact that we're in different countries? I went ahead and archived it so hopefully that fixes things. Thanks, --Bcschneider53 (talk) 15:46, 18 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
That's good. Prompting to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 15:55, 18 August 2016 (UTC)Reply