Talk:Castle Quarter (Budapest)

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Buidhe in topic Requested move 2 June 2020

Requested move 2 June 2020 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) buidhe 01:08, 19 June 2020 (UTC)Reply



VárnegyedCastle Quarter (Budapest) – Clearer name for the English language wiki --evrik (talk) 17:04, 2 June 2020 (UTC)Relisting. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 19:58, 11 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • Castle Quarter (Budapest) would be even more clear to most English readers, I think. Dicklyon (talk) 17:25, 2 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Okay. --evrik (talk) 20:16, 2 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose. Can't see any reason for this. "Clearer name for the English language wiki" is not a valid reason to move. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:18, 3 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
    • Try a google search on "Castle Quarter (Budapest)" and you will see that this is what it is referred to in English. --evrik (talk) 16:30, 3 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
      • I think he means that "clearer" is not among the WP:CRITERIA that your rationale should be based on. The relevant criterion here would be WP:RECOGNIZABILITY, which is supported by WP:COMMONNAME. Dicklyon (talk) 16:45, 3 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
      • First, that's not what your nomination said. Second, reliable English-language sources use both forms. -- Necrothesp (talk) 17:55, 3 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
        • I think that Dicklyon stated what I wanted o say. In any case, I believe the preponderance of English sources refer to the English name AND it makes sense. --evrik (talk) 21:33, 3 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.