Talk:Cash for comment affair

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

Australia: Sydney Mid‑importance

	Australia portal Cash for comment affair is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Sydney (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

"after he had been found to have been less than impartial in his role in "cash for comment" investigations" - obviously the letters to Jones were highly inappropriate, but was there actually an official finding to this effect? If so, the organisation making that finding should be identified; if not, this bit should be reworded to avoid giving that impression. --Calair 10:08, 22 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Incorrect reference edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Reference [1] should read Flew, Terry... I cannot seem to edit the article to correct this error. Please remember WP:BITE! See http://eprints.qut.edu.au/19259/ for a citation of this article. --LavaDimNylons 03:07, 22 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

In this case the quickest way to find the word needing fixing would of been to search for it and then replace it. My browser allows this by pressing Crtl + F to find in page. Hope that tips helps and thanks for pointing out the error, no matter how minor. - Shiftchange (talk) 03:26, 22 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

That's the thing- I couldn't find it by the usual means. Cheers for the reversion.LavaDimNylons (talk) 03:30, 22 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic