Talk:Case of the Dean of St Asaph
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Ironholds in topic Title
 | Case of the Dean of St Asaph has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 29, 2011. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the defence counsel in The Case of the Dean of St Asaph was given the Freedom of the City of Gloucester, even though the defendant was found guilty? | |||||||||
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Title edit
The word "The" as in "The Case" doesn't seem to be part of a commonly used proper noun. Shouldn't the title of the article be renamed "Case of the Dean of St Asaph" instead? Deryck C. 17:49, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- Except every source I've got includes "the". Ironholds (talk) 18:39, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- (after a conflict of edits) FWIW, even bearing in mind that "otherstuffexists" isn't a great argument, the learned Mr Ironholds himself/yourself penned the excellent article that is presently entitled Case of the Hooded Man and one might have thought that similar cases should indeed be treated similarly, both in terms of the presence or absence of an opening definitive article and, perhaps also, the existence or otherwise of titular italics. BencherliteTalk 18:40, 27 June 2011 (UTC)