Talk:Carver Mead
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Finding sources edit
With regard to finding sources, perhaps a more experienced editor than me will consider this one from Thursday, September 25, 2003: Laputan Logic --Pawyilee (talk) 07:52, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Not Wikiquote edit
Quotations sections do not belong on Wikipedia WP:NOT WP:QUOTE they go on Wikiquote instead. 64.4.93.100 (talk) 17:04, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
- I don't see that applying here. Quotations of Mead would not be loosely associated with an article about him. They also display the subject's insight and personality. Glrx (talk) 01:02, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
- "Do not insert any number of quotations in a stand-alone quote section" WP:QUOTE. 64.4.93.100 (talk) 13:02, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
- WP:QUOTE is an essay and not policy. See also WP:Village pump (policy)#WP:QUOTE. Glrx (talk) 13:43, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
- "If you want to enter lists of quotations, put them into our sister project Wikiquote". 64.4.93.100 (talk) 14:01, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
- "While Wikipedia's written policies and guidelines should be taken seriously, they can be misused. Do not follow an overly strict interpretation of the letter of policy without consideration for the principles of policies. If the rules truly prevent you from improving the encyclopedia, ignore them. Disagreements are resolved through consensus-based discussion, not by tightly sticking to rules and procedures. Furthermore, policies and guidelines themselves may be changed to reflect evolving consensus." 85.211.125.202 (talk) 19:12, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
- Well then look at the pump discussion because that's the consensus. Quotes integrated into the article not by themselves. 64.4.93.100 (talk) 20:36, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
- "While Wikipedia's written policies and guidelines should be taken seriously, they can be misused. Do not follow an overly strict interpretation of the letter of policy without consideration for the principles of policies. If the rules truly prevent you from improving the encyclopedia, ignore them. Disagreements are resolved through consensus-based discussion, not by tightly sticking to rules and procedures. Furthermore, policies and guidelines themselves may be changed to reflect evolving consensus." 85.211.125.202 (talk) 19:12, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
- "If you want to enter lists of quotations, put them into our sister project Wikiquote". 64.4.93.100 (talk) 14:01, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
- WP:QUOTE is an essay and not policy. See also WP:Village pump (policy)#WP:QUOTE. Glrx (talk) 13:43, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
- "Do not insert any number of quotations in a stand-alone quote section" WP:QUOTE. 64.4.93.100 (talk) 13:02, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Carver Mead. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130308025739/http://www.computerhistory.org/fellowawards/hall/bios/Carver,Mead/ to http://www.computerhistory.org/fellowawards/hall/bios/Carver,Mead/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:45, 15 December 2017 (UTC)