Talk:Cartier Building

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Cwmhiraeth in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination edit

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:14, 14 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
Cartier New York

5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 18:41, 19 June 2021 (UTC).Reply

  •   5x expansion confirmed. Like hook 1 best. length of hook satisfactory. Article in excellent shape. DavidCane (talk) 23:48, 19 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cartier Building/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 23:31, 1 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:31, 1 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Comments edit

  • Move "Use mdy dates" below the hatnote.
  • Add alt text to every image being used.
  • "on the site to designs" - reword
  • "making an agreement" → "agreeing"
  • "become the his house" → "become his house"
  • "in 4 East 52nd Street" → "at 4 East 52nd Street"
  • Wikilink The New York Times.

Progress edit

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  
@Some Dude From North Carolina: Thanks. I have done all of these now. Epicgenius (talk) 05:16, 9 July 2021 (UTC)Reply