Talk:Carmel Valley AVA

This should be a pure geography article

Take a look at Carmel Valley, California. It is a larger stub for the same town. This article should either be merged into Carmel Valley, California or deleted. Carmel Valley, if it exists as an article at all, should just be about the Carmel River valley, not the town. Mike Dillon 04:10, August 29, 2005 (UTC)

I disagree I was interested in the housing prices ect. ect. I think there should be popculture connotations discussed in the article

i'd suggest seeing the talk page for Carmel Valley Village, CA --67.124.151.243 05:19, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

I added a link in the External Links section to a 71Miles' article, but did not change any other part of the entry. 71Miles is my company. Our articles are a valuable resource to Wikipedia readers when presented in the appropriate context. Our articles are written to inform readers about a destination. To include them in the External Link section is to use that section exactly as it is intended. I have seen multiple instance where links to The New York Times articles and other prominent publications are included in External Link sections on similar topics. Since our writers have been published by the New York Times and other prominent publications, and 71Miles articles are of equal quality, it would have to be bias against independent publishers not to include our links while allowing the Times' links to remain. (Asruge 21:05, 4 July 2007 (UTC))

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Carmel Valley AVA. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080119234526/http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov:80/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr;sid=bff700d0bbb2a632948b70fe7e91d7d4;rgn=div5;view=text;node=27%3A1.0.1.1.7;idno=27;cc=ecfr to http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr;sid=bff700d0bbb2a632948b70fe7e91d7d4;rgn=div5;view=text;node=27%3A1.0.1.1.7;idno=27;cc=ecfr#27:1.0.1.1.7.3.41.38
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080127115948/http://www.iwineinstitute.com/ava/avabystate.asp to http://www.iwineinstitute.com/ava/avabystate.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080514100658/http://www.carmelvalleychamber.com/wineries.html to http://www.carmelvalleychamber.com/wineries.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081023213844/http://www.mst.org:80/routes/list.htm to http://www.mst.org/routes/list.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:02, 15 November 2016 (UTC)