Talk:Carl Baudenbacher

Latest comment: 3 years ago by 85.164.182.183 in topic Too long and without sources

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Carl Baudenbacher. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:50, 15 November 2016 (UTC)Reply


Too long and without sources edit

Hi all,

This article seems to contain a lot of information that seems peripheral, such as the long list of cases Baudenbacher has been involved with in the EFTA Court without any context for why they were significant, the long list of colleges he has been invited to give lectures at, and the extremely long list of publications under the somewhat misleading heading "Significant publications".

There is only one source listed, an op-ed written by the article subject himself. The citation pratice generally seems woefully inadequate, with several sources simply appearing in parentheses without any context (for instance under "Judiciary", where there is a direct quotation and then the name of the person supposedly having written it, without any specification of where or when). Furthermore, the reference to Dagens Næringsliv 16 April 2011 neglects to mention that the title "Kong Carl av EØS" is a tongue-in-cheeck reference to the Norwegian judicial community's mostly negative view of Baudenbacher, though it is fair to say that it underlines the point that he was in a powerful position as a judge on the EFTA Court.

Under the heading "Judiciary" there seems to be a long digression into the role of the EFTA Court, which has no place in this context and seems to reflect the position of the article's subject, again without any references.

To provide a more concise overview of the subject matter the article should be significantly reduced in length. 85.164.182.183 (talk) 16:13, 30 June 2020 (UTC)Reply