Talk:Care (Law & Order: UK)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Care (Law & Order: UK). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090225192432/http://tv.sky.com:80/preview-law-order-uk to http://tv.sky.com/preview-law-order-uk
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090218111910/http://blogs.thestage.co.uk:80/tvtoday/2009/02/square-eyes-special-law-order-uk/ to http://blogs.thestage.co.uk/tvtoday/2009/02/square-eyes-special-law-order-uk/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070418100604/http://www.barb.co.uk/viewingsummary/weekreports.cfm?report=weeklyterrestrial&requesttimeout=500 to http://www.barb.co.uk/viewingsummary/weekreports.cfm?report=weeklyterrestrial&RequestTimeout=500
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.tv.com/law-and-order-uk/care/episode/1253962/reviews.html?tag=episode_tabs;reviews

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:23, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Care (Law & Order: UK). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://tv.sky.com/preview-law-order-uk
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100418153002/http://www.universal-playback.com/news/the-critics-and-the-audience-love-law-order-uk to http://www.universal-playback.com/news/the-critics-and-the-audience-love-law-order-uk
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://blogs.thestage.co.uk/tvtoday/2009/02/square-eyes-special-law-order-uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:50, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

short descriptions

On 3 June 2023 at 16:25 UTC, I—among other changes—added a {{short description}} to this article that said, First episode of Law & Order: UK. Eighty-six minutes later, Gonnym (talk · contribs) removed the template and said infobox handles description. This is, of course, true. However, {{infobox television episode}} clearly says, If the automatic short description is not optimal, replace it by adding {{Short description}} at the top of the article. Furthermore, one of the purposes of that short description is to provide a very brief indication of the field covered by the article. That's why the {{short description}} template was added in the first place, because the automatic short description is less optimal. When I replaced the template 103 minutes later, I tried to point other editors to those pages and their explanations by saying, Undid […] IAW template:infobox television episode & WP:SDESC. Instead, Gonnym didn't read those links and returned four minutes later repeating their first note, phrasing it this time as, Undid […] please note that the infobox automatically handles this. There is no reason to manually do this. I hope this thorough explanation about the templates' pages is sufficiently understandable, and serves as the edit summary for my impending third placement of the short-description template. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 20:38, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

I understood why you did it, I however, disagree that the default short description which works on over 10k pages isn't good enough here and that yours was an improvment over it. Gonnym (talk) 05:50, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

One of the explicit purposes of short descriptions is to be a very brief indication, and formatting instructions dictate them to be short – no longer than is needed to fulfill its functions effectively. Please point to which of the following descriptions more-optimally meets those criteria:

• First episode of Law & Order: UK
• 1st episode of the 1st season of Law & Order: UK

Given that consensus at the short-descriptions page itself highly-prioritizes concision, and the two options are communicating the exact same information, I think I can determine which one is objectively not optimal. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 15:41, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

A week later with no further discussion, I'm going to replace the manual {{short description}}. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 16:14, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

I cited the instructions for both the short descriptions and the episode infobox templates in the explanation above. It was not disputed nor questioned in the week after I posted, and so, as I said, I replaced the manual template, saying in part, + replacement of manual {{short description}} IAW discussion at talk on 11 June 2023 at 16:14 UTC. It only took Gonnym 23.67 hours to notice the change before they reverted, saying only Remove manual replacement. Again. They provided no indication or explanation for their contravention of the consensuses I cited above, nor have they participated in this discussion beyond one unelaborated proclamation of I however, disagree. I don't want to encourage another user's edit war, but if they don't read the pages & discussions linked, and don't participate being effectively just saying 'no', I'm stumped on how not to. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 16:43, 12 June 2023 (UTC)