Talk:Caracal/GA1

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Gug01 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gug01 (talk · contribs) 21:24, 12 January 2015 (UTC)Reply


Immediate problems

edit

Cleanup banners

edit

This article does not need or have many cleanup banners, such as {{clarifyme}}, {{citation needed}} and {{POW}} tags.

Plagiarism

edit

This article does not plagiarise. The images are also properly licensed.

References

edit

The references are perfect. All paragraphs are properly sourced.

Images

edit

The images are relevant to the topic and they have suitable captions.

Well-written?

edit

This article is well-written. It contains perfect prose. It has a lead section and proper layout. The spelling, grammar, punctuation and capitalization.

Original research

edit

This article contains no original research.

Coverage

edit

This article is broad in coverage and goes into detail only where necessary.

This article has a neutral point of view.

Stability

edit

This article is relatively stable. There has been no edit wars, but there has been quite a few undos in the history of the article due to vandalisms. However, these are not large-scale, so I can summarize that the stability is good enough for this article to be a good article.

Overview

edit

This article is ready to be a good article.