Talk:Canon PowerShot SX1 IS

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Whitehorse1 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Canon PowerShot SX 1 IS/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

I am failing this article because it is little more than a datasheet. It contains only 3 or so sentences of prose total and a feature list – which is duplicated in part or entirety by the Infobox.

It contains no references, on the very little information it has, that are not already contained in the "Sources" section – a group of four webpage links inserted into it. Additionally, at approximately 24 hours old, it is unlikely an article would be ready.

Because of the condition of this article I am not performing a full review under the Good Article criteria. The article should not be considered for nomination again unless it has been substantially expanded. To gain an understanding of the standard of a Good Article, I recommend examining recently-listed Good Articles or discussing suitable material for this article at a relevant WikiProject. –Whitehorse1 07:31, 20 February 2009 (UTC)Reply