Talk:Canicross

Latest comment: 10 years ago by 213.194.42.100 in topic Merge proposal

Merge proposal edit

It looks like Cani cross and canicross cover the same ground. Having two separate articles is a form of content forkery. — Ƶ§œš¹ [ãːɱ ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɪ̃ə̃nlɪ] 00:44, 21 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

The Interwiki links to Canicross. Imho Cani cross is the better written article. Canicross should be deleted and replaced by a redirect. →213.194.42.100 (talk) 11:39, 18 July 2013 (UTC)Reply