Talk:Canesta

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Logo is not actually Canesta's Logo

Latest comment: 8 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Canesta was acquired by Microsoft (as laid out in the article!) but it seems a new company adopted the brand, and the logo for that new company is the one on this article. You can see their real, now dead, logo on the wayback machine here: https://web.archive.org/web/20100502073030/http://canesta.com/

mooshberry->talk; 02:22, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

[Untitled]

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I saw a request for input on the technology page. My comments are as follows:

Good to see that you included a high quality company logo
The history of the company is of very limited interest to anyone other than the founder. If you were Nintendo, maybe you could lead with it, but...
Finances is borderline violation of policy - I'm no expert on the letter of the law, but it violates the spirit
The two important & interesting facets of the article: "massively parallel LIDAR" and "3D time-of-flight camera" are drowned in the corporate bumph
If you are trying to sell your company to geeks, put in good pictures and good, technical descriptions that improve on the ones on the pages linked above

Here endeth the opinion. Dhatfield (talk) 02:13, 6 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic