Talk:Candidatus Desulforudis audaxviator

Archaea

Bacterium? Isnt this an archaea instead? (82.131.117.1 21:17, 15 February 2007 (UTC))

No, it is identified as a bacterium. And some genes are now noted to be like archaea, which implies that it is also being noted as not being archaea. -- SEWilco (talk) 03:40, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Candidatus

Shouldn't this binomial name be Candidatus Desulforudis audaxviator (Candidatus:Italic, Desulforudis audaxviator:upright type)? --Kingfiser (talk) 15:59, 20 December 2015 (UTC)