Talk:Canadian motion picture rating system
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Canadian motion picture rating system article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Superseded ratings edit
I've found indications that an "F" rating was used at one time in Canada in the 1970s, but it isn't listed in the article, perhaps because it has been superseded or dropped. Perhaps someone more familiar with the history of the ratings system could add early ratings such as this with a word of explanation of when and why they were changed or dropped. — QuicksilverT @ 22:09, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Canadian motion picture rating system. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071027035131/http://www.ofrb.gov.on.ca/english/page6.htm to http://www.ofrb.gov.on.ca/english/page6.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071212120237/http://www.rcq.qc.ca/mult/process.asp?lng=en to http://www.rcq.qc.ca/mult/process.asp?lng=en
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:16, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
SPA removing a citation to British Columbia's Film Classification office edit
Twice now, Moviez123 has removed a citation to the British Columbia Film Classification Office, and replaced it with sub-standard references. On the first occasion it was replaced with a citation to IMDB which despite not being a reliable source per WP:RS/IMDB didn't even corroborate the claim in the article. On the second occasion the citation was replaced by a source of dubious quality. Neither of these are of comparable quality to the BC Film Classification Office and I do not really understand why the editor is pursuing this. We have a high quality source in place and there is no reason to replace it. These edits are the only edits made by the editor and seem motivated by the determination to remove a link to the BCFCO rather than improving the article in any discernible way. Betty Logan (talk) 16:44, 17 August 2018 (UTC)