Talk:Can of Worms (interchange)/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Untitled
This information is briefly covered in the Rochester, New York article, and probably doesn't need its own article. Since the Can of Worms doesn't exist anymore, it's not likely to be looked up.
- Except it's a named interchange, and it was named for the usual reason (it was a mess). I recently opened a category on the matter and categorized this article. I would think even former interchanges would carry a little significance in such a category. --WhosAsking 22:25, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
Cultural reference?
What about Can of worms' use in pop culture and literature? I'm sure it doesn't always refer to a particular intersection.Stale Fries 01:58, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Possible reference needed to the idiom "to open a can of worms", i.e. lots of problems. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rjcunningham (talk • contribs) 14:46, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
I don't know whether or not the term "can of worms" warrants its own Wikipedia page. Possibly a link somewhere to the wiktionary term? Bill shannon (talk) 05:40, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Minnesota interchange
The information about the Minnesota interchange needs to be split off - it has nothing to do with the interchange in Rochester and the two interchanges are not related. It'd be like covering two separate alignments of a designation in an article, which we do not do. Instead, each separate alignment has its own article or a redirect to another article. – TMF 09:41, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
- Split to a paragraph in Interstate 35 in Minnesota since there was no opposition to the proposal. – TMF 06:09, 16 June 2009 (UTC)