Talk:Cameron Colvin

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Jéské Couriano in topic Legal Controversies

Legal Controversies edit

Need to add more details. The references are loaded with details that would give more context the wikipedia page. Cyberchamp (talk) 04:04, 11 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

The references are court documents, which means they're useless for these claims. We would prefer to have news reports on the court cases. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 20:54, 11 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
A news article came out yesterday about him, regarding all of the lawsuits and judgements against him 72.216.139.69 (talk) 11:37, 28 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Link to it, please? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 11:45, 28 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
https://www.abc15.com/news/local-news/investigations/az-employees-business-partners-say-ex-nfl-player-owes-them-money 2601:8C0:882:9200:C497:3A3E:4046:1BF2 (talk) 13:28, 28 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Good, now that's something I can work with sourcing-wise. Gimme some time to read it and wordsmith something. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 00:07, 29 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Alright. Looking at this, I'm going to propose the following text, to be added to the lone sentence in the "Post-Sports Career" section and citing the abc15 piece:

Both Colvin and CamCo have lost multiple separate civil court cases alleging fraud, breach of contract, failing to pay employees, and a handful of other related charges, totaling over eight million dollars.

I admit this could be better, but at present I'm fried from work. How's this grab you all? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 00:17, 29 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
That works well. 166.199.97.125 (talk) 00:18, 29 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Added it. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 01:04, 29 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Could use some elaboration on the summary edit

I've been reading the summary and doing research. I think plenty of research out there exists to increase the content of the summary. Likewise, the article seems to be written by somebody connected to the subject. Cyberchamp (talk) 04:07, 11 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

And I've just taken a chainsaw to the article, removing everything sourced to statlines, primary sources, unusable sources, or nothing at all. Individual claims may be restored if a third-party reliable source is cited that corroborates them but as the article was it was a pretty significant policy violation. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 20:56, 11 April 2023 (UTC)Reply