Suggestions edit

I suggest we either remove the completely irrelavent and very poorly written character section, completely rewrite it in a more appropriate manner or give it its own page because it goes on for way too long. 72.152.135.105 (talk) 01:49, 7 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ill probably do something like Call of Duty 4:Modern Warfare which is currently a good article along with Call of Duty 2 БοņёŠɓɤĭĠ₳₯є 01:58, 7 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
I agree, the format in those articles is excellent. 72.152.135.105 (talk) 02:23, 7 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Critical reaction edit

I think we should add a part called Call of Duty: Finest Hour Critical Reaction about the large number of people who were upset with the quality of the game after playing Call of Duty and, Call of Duty: United Offensive. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Caleb09 (talkcontribs)

I agree, ALL information about the reaction of games, movies, should have information about how people enjoyed it, and how they didn't.

This would not be allowed; opinions affect the neutral POV of articles.
--NitemareDragon 00:48, 26 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Has anyone found the Springfield Sniper Rifle in this game?. Grand14.

Grand14, I was about to ask the same question. Anybody knows at least in what mission it is?

The Springfield actually isn't in the game, but in Mission: Natama you see the guy Yusef holding one. Cheers, JetLover (talk) 18:36, 29 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Well yeah JetLover, I know that you can see Yusef holding one in the first two missions of the British campaign: Mission: Matmata and Depot Saboteurs , but killing him will only give you a bag of ST74 grenades (sticky bombs)

OK, so if the Springfield isn't a usable weapon, why do we see it modelized at the end of the clip Making of 3 in the Extras/Gallery section? Raphlav18 July 29, 2007 16:19 AET

Ahh, I was wondering about this too, but it seems as if the designers could not include this weapon along with the supressed version of the Sten submachine gun. The springfield rifle was also shown in the weapons section of the manual. Also, there should be a Critical Reaction section in this article as it has been deleted. It is not bias to say the criticism in a neutral point of view.--LCoolo 05:03, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Thought provoking.. edit

Thought I might bring this to your attention:

http://www.gamesradar.com/f/the-wtf-world-of-wikipedia/a-2008062510326553058

--Broadbandmink (talk) 19:41, 30 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

controls edit

how about a controls section, to show how to shoot... The Master Of All Wolves (talk) 15:15, 10 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Just look at the other Call of Duty pages. They don't have a controls section. Wikipedia is not a guidebook. WP:NOTMANUAL--LCoolo 04:50, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

springfield edit

the springfield is avalible on multiplayer as the american sniper rifle i wont say alleid because the russians had the mosin-nagant scoped and im not sure what the british had —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.108.218.230 (talk) 15:22, 9 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Lee Enfield. Very cool weapon. Dual Stripper Clip. But I gotta stick to the Kar98k for my favorite.--Flynn M Taggart (talk) 14:48, 29 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Reverting Vandalism edit

The article seems to start with "It's a gay game". I can't seem to fix this — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.138.65.134 (talk) 03:20, 10 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

It says this was the first console game in the series twice.

BEST GAME edit

GREAT GAME GUYS WHO ELSE PLAYED IT? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.98.112.167 (talk) 00:14, 31 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

the troubled development of this game is a story in and of itself edit

There's no development / production section, which is shame, since there are so many juicy details. For instance, on the weekends Activision had representatives drive by the developer's offices to see how many cars were in the parking lot. And the game was originally to open with Tanya Pavelovna, "but Activision refused to open a firstperson shooter with a female character,... they feared a loss of sales to young males and wouldn't budge." I added the source to the top of the page. Such a goldmine of information. Neuroxic (talk) 08:18, 6 October 2016 (UTC)Reply