Talk:California's 16th congressional district

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on California's 16th congressional district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090203072316/http://sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2002_general/congress.pdf to http://sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2002_general/congress.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081127061822/http://sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2006_general/congress.pdf to http://sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2006_general/congress.pdf
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2008_general/congress.pdf
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2010_general/congress.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131019044155/http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2012-general/12-us-reps.pdf to http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2012-general/12-us-reps.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:03, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on California's 16th congressional district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110810210911/http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2006_general/ssov/gov_by_cd.pdf to http://sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2006_general/ssov/gov_by_cd.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110810210917/http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2006_general/ssov/us_sen_by_cd.pdf to http://sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2006_general/ssov/us_sen_by_cd.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110520020308/http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2004_general/ssov/pres_general_ssov_congressional.pdf to http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2004_general/ssov/pres_general_ssov_congressional.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110810211138/http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2004_general/ssov/us_senate_ssov_congressional.pdf to http://sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2004_general/ssov/us_senate_ssov_congressional.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110520020512/http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2003_special/ssov/recall_ques_cd.pdf to http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2003_special/ssov/recall_ques_cd.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110520020528/http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2003_special/ssov/gov_cd.pdf to http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2003_special/ssov/gov_cd.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101111170552/http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2002_general/ssov/gov_cong.pdf to http://sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2002_general/ssov/gov_cong.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110520021824/http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2000_general/ssov/cong_dis.pdf to http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2000_general/ssov/cong_dis.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110520021829/http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2000_general/ssov/us_senate_cong_dis.pdf to http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2000_general/ssov/us_senate_cong_dis.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080910000350/http://sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2004_general/us20reps20all20formatted.pdf to http://sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2004_general/us20reps20all20formatted.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:29, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on California's 16th congressional district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090214145449/http://www.2008racetracker.com/page/CA-16 to http://www.2008racetracker.com/page/CA-16
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141221123634/http://vote2014.sos.ca.gov/returns/us-rep/district/16/ to http://vote2014.sos.ca.gov/returns/us-rep/district/16/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:13, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Congressional district map

I don't think the map appearing at the top of the page is correct. Looks like the 19th district, not the 16th. 155.201.150.21 (talk) 19:14, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

You should read the description right below the map. Redistricting has renumbered many districts, including this one. —twotwofourtysix^{(talk || edits)} 12:56, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Terminology

The current organization of the articles on California House districts is misleading at best, given the extent to which districts change location over time. The current 16th District does not overlap the 2013-23 16th District at all, so showing the history of the "16th District" is misleading. I'm not sure how to fix this problem, but I think this article would be more informative if it talked about the history of whatever the historical district(s) that most closely overlaps the current district, rather than the district that has been named the "16th". The current 16th district is the successor to the 2013-23 18th district, not to the old 16th district. Rks13 (talk) 01:54, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

All US congressional district articles correspond to the old district lines under the same number, regardless of where it might be or whether they're swapped with one another. Your suggestion of the history section showing the district that "most closely overlaps the current district" would be confusing if a former congressman represented an old district but which actually links to a completely separate district. Also, that criteria is pretty vague and practically unworkable in Wikipedia. We already have representatives listed as being "redistricted from/to" another district, as well as the prose explaining the situation and linking to the different old and new districts; I'm fine with that. —twotwofourtysix^{(talk || edits)} 02:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)