Talk:Caledon Institute of Social Policy

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Wieno in topic Reversion to Stub

Reversion to Stub edit

Most of the updates made to this article were by an IP address registered to the Caledon Institute and a couple by a user that appears to be affiliated with the Caledon Institute. Given that all of the information was unsourced (except to the website of the Caledon Institute) and a good chunk of it appeared to be copied directly from that website (raising copyright concerns), I felt the best response was to revert all of those edits back to the article as a stub. The Caledon Institute is notable enough for a Wikipedia page, but there isn't much secondary source information on what it does. Under those circumstances, better to leave it as a stub than to have a lot of advertisement-style information from the subject of the article. Wieno (talk) 15:53, 7 May 2015 (UTC)Reply