This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I removed (In fact Henry VI granted 23 licences to crenellate but not one for Caister castle. Fastolf was one of a group of men granted a licence to crenellate Rye House, Hertfordshire. This error arises from misconception about licences to crenellate being a requirement to build castles. (Ref. Davis, P., 2007, 'English Licences to Crenellate 1199-1567' Castle Studies Group Journal Vol. 20)) this as it had been put in the lead, a bit intrusively. It may well be correct~i expect it is, but i cannot properly correctit now,becauseo f the lack of accessto my PC.Cheers, LindsayHello 04:36, 28 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
I don't have the article to hand, but the footnote certainly rings true to what I've read recently on licences to crenellate. I've changed the information into the form of a footnote for now, although I think it could go in the main body of the article. Nev1 (talk) 18:20, 28 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, Nev1. I think what you did looksgood,or even could be worked in, as you suggest,in the main body. I'dprobably try the latter,would'vedoneyesterday,but the accesi have is rotten at the moment 9in fact, i've not really contributedfora week ormore becauseof it), not to mention this keyboard which doesn'tlike me at all! Cheers, LindsayHello 18:14, 1 March 2011 (UTC)Reply