Talk:C.I.D. Investigators
Latest comment: 15 years ago by AustralianRupert in topic Questioning the Mil Hist tag
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled edit
Added info, and cleared up what caused the C.I.D. men to first come. —Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]])
Questioning the Mil Hist tag edit
I'm not sure that this article should be tagged for the military history project. It doesn't seem to fit into any military history project task forces. Does anyone else feel the same? AustralianRupert (talk) 04:41, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
- I agree and have removed the tag. --dashiellx (talk) 16:56, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- Cheers, mate. AustralianRupert (talk) 03:52, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- I agree and have removed the tag. --dashiellx (talk) 16:56, 16 April 2009 (UTC)