Talk:C++14

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Mid-importance).

C/C++ High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject C/C++, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of C and C++ topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.C/C++Wikipedia:WikiProject C/C++Template:WikiProject C/C++C/C++ articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

C/C++

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject C/C++, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of C and C++ topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.C/C++Wikipedia:WikiProject C/C++Template:WikiProject C/C++C/C++ articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Compiler Support? edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago5 comments5 people in discussion

I'm wondering if we should add a section on the state of C++14 feature support in various compilers. I'm not an expert by any means, but it appears from this Visual C++ blog post on the VC++ conformance roadmap that as of today 9 September 2013 with the release of Visual Studio 2013 RTM, several of the C++14 features are supported in a release-quality compiler.

I think it would be very useful for people reading up on C++14 to know what features they can start using as of right now. I would add a table for this myself to the page but 1) I'm not comfortable adding information to a page I'm not an expert on and 2) I only know of VC++ support. Other widely-used compilers like gcc and clang may have support, but I don't know, and I don't want to appear to favor VC++ on the page. Thoughts? Ricodued (talk) 17:54, 9 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

The Clang site has some details of C++1y implementation status. (This only lists language features - library features would depend on which library is used.) The GCC site also has some details: C++1y/C++14 Support in GCC. (Again, language features only. I can't find any information on library support - perhaps there isn't any yet.) --Zundark (talk) 16:40, 13 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

In case of auto return type for functions can you please also mention about cyclic dependency in function calls and also how C++11 standard deals with this issue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.139.38.11 (talk) 10:33, 9 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Compiler support was the precise thing I was looking for, and you've posted the precise question I was about to ask here. I think we should have a compiler support table if we reasonably can - David Gerard (talk) 22:53, 19 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

There is a compiler support table on cppreference (look below the table for C++11/C++14/TS/C++17 support in those compilers and libraries that document it. I don't see how it would work on wikipedia. Perhaps, with some effort, one could come up with an adoption history table: "compiler/library X announced full support on Y" --Cubbi (talk) 14:23, 12 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

C++14 Released edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

https://isocpp.org/blog/2014/08/we-have-cpp14 31.6.129.84 (talk) 20:54, 18 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic