Talk:Butterfly Lovers

Merge

Since Butterfly Lovers and Liang Zhu are really talking about the same legend, I suggest that they should be merged. --Carlsmith 17:00, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

Go for it! Tedernst 17:30, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

Do you know the story about butterflies causing ripples in the air and that those ripples are felt around the world and in other places. Any help with the original source for the story would be appreciated.

About Masterpieces of the Oral and Intangible Heritage of Humanity

Hi, I have just checked the record of Masterpieces of the Oral and Intangible Heritage of Humanity，but I can't find any record that China made a formal application for Masterpieces of the Oral and Intangible Heritage of Humanity. Also I have done some research that Ministry of PRC has submit this story to Intangible Heritage In China (Not the UNESCO one)zh:中國國家級非物質文化遺產 since 2006. I want to confirm that whether PRC made a formal application for Masterpieces of the Oral and Intangible Heritage of Humanity or not. --Thomas Lau 14:04, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Done. TheAsianGURU (talk) 18:43, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Track

This play has an well-known melody for the violin,so like silent night or other songs, should we include a short recording of the violin part as part of the main page? Prottos007 (talk) 21:59, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

====================

Hi there, There is another movie: 1962 The Love Eterne. See IMDB.

75.25.168.142 (talk) 07:48, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

unnecesary hiddeous comparation

Saying that Butterfly Lovers is an "equivalent" to Romeo and Juliet doesnt add anything to the article more than a link to Shakepeare play if the article wants to describe the story then it should say so in a few well selected words whats it about instead of giving another play as a reference assuming that readers are white anglospeakers who heard of romeo and juliet, this story is equivalent to none it has its own identity and it precedes Romeo and juliet by hundreds of years so if anyones if the senior is the chinese story, i dont see in Romeo and Juliet article statements "Romeo and Juliet is the english equivalent to Butterfly Lovers",eurocentrism.--Andres rojas22 (talk) 18:00, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

• http://www.chinahighlights.com/ningbo/attraction/liangzhu-park.htm

  Triggered by \bchinahighlights\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 17:30, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Please no more Romeo & Juliet

Just because an English-language book and a violin concerto catering to foreign viewers advertise the story as the "Oriental/Eastern/Asian Romeo and Juliet" doesn't mean that the comparison should be noted on a serious encyclopaedia. Google "Chinese Hitler" on Google Books and you see more than a few "reliable source"-references to Chiang Kai-shek and Mao Zedong, are you going to go to their pages and add "sometimes referred to as Chinese Hitler" in the leading paragraphs? Of course not. Also see Andres rojas22 (talk · contribs)'s comments above. Timmyshin (talk) 04:47, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Butterfly Lovers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080203140354/http://www.wchol.com/html/fwzwh.html to http://www.wchol.com/html/fwzwh.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:06, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Butterfly Lovers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://portal.unesco.org/culture/en/ev.php-URL_ID%3D2226%26URL_DO%3DDO_TOPIC%26URL_SECTION%3D201.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041028003350/http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2004-06/15/content_1526831.htm to http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2004-06/15/content_1526831.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141006103301/http://www.eastasia.ntu.edu.tw/chinese/data/9-1/9-1-2/9-1-2.pdf to http://www.eastasia.ntu.edu.tw/chinese/data/9-1/9-1-2/9-1-2.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050829091426/http://www.butterflylovers.org/ to http://www.butterflylovers.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:02, 7 January 2018 (UTC)