Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page edit

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.railway-technology.com/projects/busanbimhae/
    Triggered by \brailway-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 11:22, 3 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 20:41, 9 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Busan Station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:48, 11 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Busan Station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:36, 27 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Seoul station which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 03:00, 2 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 29 May 2020 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:31, 16 June 2020 (UTC)Reply


– In the previous thinly attended multi-RM discussion at Talk:Seoul Station, the fact that these two are commonly lowercase in sources was overlooked. Per WP:NCCAPS and MOS:CAPS, we should lowercase station on these, as with most other station articles. Dicklyon (talk) 02:44, 29 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Background edit

See books usage: Busan station and Daegu station are both commonly enough lowercase; that is nowhere near the usual threshold of consistently capitalized in sources. News results similarly show lowercase often enough to suggest that "Station" is not part of the proper name. Dicklyon (talk) 02:48, 29 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Survey edit

  • Support. The proposed title is in the usual for stations without common English-language names. See Incheon station and Category:South Korean railway station stubs. Allan Rice (talk) 05:55, 29 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose per the current consensus Talk:Seoul Station#Requested move 2 May 2020. They are proper nouns which their metro stations were named after. I am suffering from User:Dicklyon's incessant requested moves. User:Dicklyon should inform all participants of Talk:Seoul Station on this. Sawol (talk) 00:59, 1 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Support. The English WP's Manual of Style says to minimise capitalisation (i.e. use it only if really necessary). The Chicago and Oxford style guides give similar rulings. Dicklyon is doing us a favour, actually. Tony (talk) 02:04, 1 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per nom and Allan Rice (in detail: per MOS:CAPS, WP:NCCAPS, and what must be at least 100 RMs by now of "Foo station", "Bar line", and other transit/transport topics; a handful of exceptions thus far are not a general rule, but unusual outliers).  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  11:33, 2 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Support. From the evidence of usage in books (see OP) "station" is not consistently capitalised and does not meet the criteria to cap per MOS:CAPS and WP:NCCAPS. Regards, Cinderella157 (talk) 00:34, 5 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:04, 26 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:32, 25 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:52, 16 December 2022 (UTC)Reply