Talk:Bureau of State Services

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Yoninah in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination edit

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 20:46, 3 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Created by John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk). Self-nominated at 02:19, 17 September 2020 (UTC).Reply

  •   John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) The article is long enough and new enough with no copyright violations. The hook information is directly cited and I prefer the original hook. There are only two issues - A QPQ is needed and the 36th reference has an error message with its formatting. SL93 (talk) 18:24, 18 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
@SL93: QPQ provided, reference error corrected. John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 08:20, 19 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
  Thank you. This is ready. SL93 (talk) 17:09, 19 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
  •   There is an awful lot of blue-linking in these hooks. Is this the hookiest thing you can say about the subject? It sounds like it would have limited interest outside the U.S. Yoninah (talk) 19:11, 24 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Yoninah: Unfortunately, it seems to just not be that interesting of an agency on the whole. Here are a few ALTs, but I'm not sure if they're any better. John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 22:44, 24 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
  New hooks require review. John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 01:47, 1 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • @John P. Sadowski (NIOSH): I read through the whole article and you're right, there's almost nothing to say. Most of the article is very bureaucratic as opposed to descriptive. ALT3 comes closest to mentioning an eye-popping word like malaria, but the rest of the hook is uninteresting. Can you focus on one descriptive function and build a hook around it? Yoninah (talk) 19:58, 1 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Yoninah: Having spent some time doing a moderate amount of extra web searching, I think this is the best we're going to get without doing a real deep dive into finding new sources. During this period the real action was with the individual divisions, with the bureau being a thin administrative layer over a lot of disparate functions. I'd prefer a hook that spoke to the diversity of the bureau's functions, rather than focusing on one at the expense of the others, if neither type of hook would be a real zinger. John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 21:35, 1 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • On second thought, we'll go with ALT1 and leave the blue linking for the recognizable agency names. Sorry for the hassle. Yoninah (talk) 20:46, 3 October 2020 (UTC)Reply