This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article was created or improved during this WikiProject's 50,000 Challenge, which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help!
Logically.ai as authority on journalistic ethicsedit
Latest comment: 9 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
There's a discussion about the editorial content of logically.ai in the RSN archives. There was no consensus that their editorial content may be used in articles. But here we have a flat-out statement "violation of journalistic ethics" cited to that source. I'm in favor of removing it. ☆ Bri (talk) 15:30, 7 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
The statement in question is sourced to one of their fact checks. Isi96 (talk) 02:54, 9 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
