Talk:Brunswick Falls/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Praseodymium-141 (talk · contribs) 17:14, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Thank you!! Jake Jakubowski (Talk) 17:43, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

Looks decent, but slightly short. I'll check these later.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

   b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a. (reference section):

   b. (citations to reliable sources):

   c. (OR):

   d. (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a. (major aspects):

   b. (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

   b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

Comments

• Ancient history#Indigenous peoples seems to be about Maine, not Brunswick Falls.
  •  Done I took out the first paragraph and slightly reworded the second paragraph.
• Throughout the 19th Century,... - Century should be lowercase.
  •  Done
• Colonel Loammi Baldwin, of Boston - from?
  •  Done of Boston ==> from Boston

Sorry, I ran out of time, that's all of the prose comments so far. ¹⁴¹Pr {contribs} 20:55, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

More:

• Salmon, Sturgeon, Alewife and shad... - Sturgeon and Alewife should be lowercase.
  •  Done
• Shad, Salmon and Strugeon - same thing.
  •  Done
• Explain make it up the ladder.
  •  Done ==> are able to swim up the steps of the ladder.

There's all the prose comments. ¹⁴¹Pr {contribs} 06:43, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

More:  Completed

• Is Publius Research reliable?
  • yes, as they cite their sources
• Is energyjustice.net reliable?
  • yes, as they cite their sources
• Is newspapers.com reliable? ¹⁴¹Pr {contribs} 21:03, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
  • yes, these are actual newspapers articles.

Couldn't find any more issues, so passing. ¹⁴¹Pr {contribs} 09:55, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.