Talk:Bruce Jones (comics)
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A.k.a. edit
Didn't realize someone had changed it to "aka" when I reverted it to "a.k.a." — I thought I was fixing something I'd written myself. I couldn't find any guidance about the term at Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style, though that page does mention the Chicago Manual of Style — whose official page [1] doesn't say antyhing about the term. Since it's an abbreviation for "also known as", and not the word "aka", I'm wondering if the periods might not make it clearer? -- Tenebrae 22:58, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
"Possibly" best known for the Hulk? edit
Is Bruce Jones best known for his recent Hulk run? Nothing against those comics, but I suspect more comic readers remember his prolific 1980s output. The article itself doesn't establish what makes the Hulk run special, other than that sales went up some unspecified degree, which is hard to put in context without sales figures for his other comics and novels. If the criteria was quantity, Jones' the screenwriter may have had the largest audience. --AC 09:05, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Bruce Jones (comics). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130120190407/http://www.enjolrasworld.com/Richard%20Arndt/The%20Warren%20Magazines%20Interviews.htm to http://www.enjolrasworld.com/Richard
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5qUwRoOAI?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.enjolrasworld.com%2FRichard%2520Arndt%2FThe%2520Complete%2520Skywald%2520Checklist.htm to http://www.enjolrasworld.com/Richard%20Arndt/The%20Complete%20Skywald%20Checklist.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:11, 9 November 2016 (UTC)