Talk:Bruce Fitzhugh
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled edit
Why is this article up for deletion?? Is it not important, or is this because of a moderators perception of importance.
AND I HAVENT EVEN FINISHED WRITING THE ARTICLE...I think i might just give up Kronix 09:24, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
- Any editor can mark an article for consideration for deletion, but only an admin can actually delete if the article does not satisfy wikiguidelines. In my opinion your article does satisfy guidelines, and does not merit deletion, in that the subject of the article has been a member of a notable band. --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 09:33, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Ok thankyou so much, and excuse me for my attitude, i just find how all this works very confusing Kronix 10:04, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
I've noticed that this page has been cut down quite a bit to reduce unsourced material. A few tidbits such as his backing vocals for the Evanescence song and involvement with Few Left Standing (I'm less familiar with this) should be included fairly, would it be possible for someone to source them? Typenolies (talk) 09:25, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bruce Fitzhugh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Replaced archive link https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.hmmagazine.com/exclusive/bruce_fitzhugh_interview_on_the_christian_subculture200310/index.php with https://web.archive.org/web/20080929170723/http://www.hmmagazine.com:80/exclusive/bruce_fitzhugh_interview_on_the_christian_subculture200310/index.php on http://www.hmmagazine.com/exclusive/bruce_fitzhugh_interview_on_the_christian_subculture200310/index.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:38, 9 November 2016 (UTC)