Talk:Bronopol

Latest comment: 3 years ago by AI0867 in topic Percentage Weight-by-volume?

Untitled edit

The external link below this article to furrental.com contradicts the statement "Liberated formaldehyde is not responsible for the biological activity associated with Bronopol". Joeylawn 03:05, 15 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Math edit

The article claims that 0.0025 is equal to 25 parts in a million. Surely it's 25 parts in ten-thousand? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.77.207.114 (talkcontribs) .

It says 0.0025 per cent. One per cent is one part in a hundred, so 0.0025 per cent is 25 parts in a million, as it says. —Keenan Pepper 15:08, 8 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

hello i suffer from a reaction to bronopol and need a produce list of products that contain broponol please can you help me?

Animated gif edit

isn't there a non-animated gif of this chemical? the animated version is rather distracting.

Henna (talk) 18:06, 1 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia does not appear to be in an encyclopedic style edit

Applications edit

This article cites a poor source for the following:

This ingredient has been restricted for use in cosmetics in Canada.[2]

http://www.goodguide.com/ingredients/50954-bromo-nitropropane-diol

If you look at that link I wouldn't say it is a very reliable source.

Updated citation to reference to Health Canada website which contains the statement on restriction of use in Canada. DferDaisy (talk) 00:50, 25 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Decomposition edit

What means "very low levels of formaldehyde" are released? How is the stoichiometric ratio? 1 formaldehyde per 1 decaying Bronopol? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.140.90.18 (talk) 11:30, 26 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Bronopol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:58, 13 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Checked bot update, no errors found, changed status to true per bot request. DferDaisy (talk) 01:36, 25 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Added source for anti-microbial effectiveness claim edit

I added a source for the claim of Bronopol's effectiveness against bacteria, but it's about 40 years old and was paid for by the Boots company, so there may be a better source out there. --Alan Trick (talk) 23:23, 5 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Added WikiProject Pharmacology tag edit

I added a tag for WikiProject Pharmacology, since bronopol is approved in the EU for the prevention and treatment of fungal infections in fish (and has an MRL for fish). DferDaisy (talk) 01:08, 25 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Percentage Weight-by-volume? edit

What does "% w/v" mean? Units are required for that to make any sort of sense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AI0867 (talkcontribs) 11:15, 31 July 2020 (UTC)Reply