Talk:Brodie Clark

Biometric Hype

Just removed a section on PA consulting, where they are quoted as saying "Biometric is mostly hype". If you read their article, that isn't what they are saying ... they seem to be saying there is a high level of hype around the technology without implying that the hype is somehow substituting or disguising reality.

Personally I'd say biometrics is "mostly hype", but the reports and research relevant to this article don't say that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.126.160.111 (talk) 14:37, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

http://dematerialisedid.com/PDFs/foresight_biometrics.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.126.160.111 (talk) 14:39, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

The graphic PA Consulting include at p.3 of their paper seems to suggest that biometrics is travelling the "innovation highway" on a journey from innovation to obsolescence along which it is fuelled mostly by hype. I have therefore re-inserted the text 2.126.160.111 removed and added the graphic – PA Consulting's own graphic – to support the re-inserted text.Brother Big (talk) 08:52, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Neutrality tag

This is a developing story about a dispute between two public figures. Even though details of both sides of the story have been published in the press, our article only sets out one of those.--FormerIP (talk) 00:08, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

What about creating an article for the issue - like - 2011 Border control pilot scheme - or - 20011 border control dispute - and redirecting this living person there. Off2riorob (talk) 00:14, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Agree that that would be a good idea. Even though it doesn't apply, I think that WP:CRIME is a good guide for this case. --FormerIP (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

PatrickOfLondon, thank you for posting those latest links to BBC and Telegraph articles about the settlement between the Home Office and Brodie Clark -- http://www.dmossesq.com/2012/03/brodie-clark-has-been-silenced-several.html Brother Big (talk) 15:33, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Brodie Clark. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20111004182629/http://www.whitehallpages.net/news/archive/185894 to http://www.whitehallpages.net/news/archive/185894

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:45, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

This article is not a biography

It's supposed to be a biography, but right now it isn't: the sections 'biometric checks' and 'warnings index' contain a large amount of information that isn't about Clark at all. This material should really be split off into a separate article (something like Technology of the UK Border Agency, perhaps), because it doesn't belong in this one. Robofish (talk) 23:41, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Brodie Clark. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120531194725/http://www.safran-group.com/site-safran-en/press-media/press-releases/2009-447/article/sagem-securite-chosen-by-ibm-to?10071 to http://www.safran-group.com/site-safran-en/press-media/press-releases/2009-447/article/sagem-securite-chosen-by-ibm-to?10071
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140202122849/http://www.ukdirectgov.com/homeoffice/ukba/sitecontent/documents/aboutus/workingwithus/ukba-news1/issue-6_178d2d3.pdf to http://www.ukdirectgov.com/homeoffice/ukba/sitecontent/documents/aboutus/workingwithus/ukba-news1/issue-6_178d2d3.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090818172606/http://www.silicon.com:80/publicsector/0,3800010403,39294213,00.htm?r=10 to http://www.silicon.com/publicsector/0,3800010403,39294213,00.htm?r=10
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.ukdirectgov.com/homeoffice/ukba/sitecontent/documents/aboutus/workingwithus/ukba-news1/issue-7_178d2d3.pdf
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.ukdirectgov.com/homeoffice/ukba/sitecontent/documents/aboutus/workingwithus/ukba-news1/issue-10_178d2d3.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120309120705/http://www.raytheon.co.uk/newsroom/news/press_release_27_11_2007.pdf to http://www.raytheon.co.uk/newsroom/news/press_release_27_11_2007.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:57, 9 November 2016 (UTC)