Talk:Broadway meeting

Military history: British / European / Early Modern / Wars of the Three Kingdoms

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)
	Wars of the Three Kingdoms task force

Worcestershire Low‑importance

	Worcestershire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Worcestershire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Worcestershire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WorcestershireWikipedia:WikiProject WorcestershireTemplate:WikiProject WorcestershireWorcestershire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Letter read in Parliament on 24 January 1648 edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

John Rushworth Mr. Rushworth's Historical Collections: Abridg'd and improv'd ..., Volume 6, p. 335

(Letter of dangerous design about Gloucestershire: read out in Parliament on 24 January)

The following Letter of Jan. 19. from a Person of Note at Gloucester read to the Commons, viz.. There was a Council held at Broadway Worcestershire, the greatest part of last Week, by about 80 discontented Officers of Col. Kempson's, Col. Ayre's, Col. Herbert's, and another Regiment of Foot, and of Col. Cook's Regiment of Horse. Their Debate was about the Surprizal of Glocester; it being alledged there were 300 Barrels of Pouder there, and that the Works being bad, they cou'd easily surprize the Town by night. Hartlebury-Castle they conceiv'd would be deliver'd 'em by Lieut. Col. Turtan ; if not, they held that easy to be surpriz'd too. They had some discourse about Ludlow, Shrewsbury, and Hereford, being assur'd that laugbourne would join 'em; and that they could have 2000 Cap-Men from Bewdly; and also that the discontented Citizens of London would furnish 'cm with present Mony. To these Debates there were about 20 Dissenters, by whom I am assur'd the General is acquainted herewith, as also the Governor and Officers. The House on debate refer'd this Business to the Committee of the Kingdom at Derby-House.

This text may prove useful for a further expansion of the article. There is a longer quote in the John William Willis-Bund book. -- PBS (talk) 12:04, 13 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic