Talk:Broadcasting and the foundation of the Premier League/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 14:50, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAGUAR  14:50, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   "a company formed by the merger of Rupert Murdoch's Sky Television and British Satellite Broadcasting" - did Murdoch own British Satellite Broadcasting? This sentence makes it sound like he owned both anyway

   "but their case was thrown out of the High Court" - link High Court of Justice

   "Arsenal, Aston Villa, Everton, Leeds United, Liverpool" - link Everton FC and Leeds United

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   No original research found.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

I couldn't find any issues with this article when reading through it. It is comprehensive, well written and well sourced. Since it meets the criteria, I see no reason to put this on hold. Nice work JAGUAR  19:40, 20 April 2016 (UTC)