Talk:British Rail Class 730
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the British Rail Class 730 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"/2" must NOT be linked edit
The /2 of Class 350/2 must NOT be linked at all, because it just redirects you to the page, which I do not want to happen on my Wikipedia experience. Please stop placing the /2 in the 4 braces, only put it in the last 2 please. Thank you. Edgar Searle (talk) 08:50, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Edgar Searle: First, regarding your remark "I do not want to happen on my Wikipedia experience", see WP:OWN. Second, since Class 350/2 works just fine, WP:NOTBROKEN applies. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 14:55, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
5-Car Livery edit
The 5-Car units are for London Northwestern Railway and thus the image showing one in West Midlands Railway livery is inaccurate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.218.212.21 (talk) 10:43, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- Good point - and do we really need diagrams with two extra cars? Enotayokel (talk) 21:01, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Clear template edit
@Redrose64 the reason I removed the template was because of how the page looked on larger screens - on the screen I use, that template pushed the references to underneath the infobox, resulting in a huge amount of empty space Danners430 (talk) 18:39, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Aventra or Landmark Class? edit
WMT have confirmed in a tweet that they intend to call their 730s the Landmark Class… should this form the name for the whole article instead of Aventra, or should it remain as Aventra with Landmark Class being used in the operator/named units section instead? Danners430 (talk) 19:21, 23 May 2024 (UTC)