Talk:British Rail Class 31

Classification queries

I have a couple of queries regarding the "Fleet details" table. Firstly, the fact that Class 31/4 is shown as 17 built + 53 converted, whereas I was under the impression that they were all retrofitted with the equipment, just that some were done many years earlier than others? In other words, I thought that all 70 are really converted (even though some of them have been 31/4 for as long as TOPS classifications have existed).

Secondly, I was once told that 31/5 was not an official classification, and that the 315xx locos were officially 31/1s. I only have the one source for this one, but it was someone who generally knew what he was talking about regarding TOPS classes...

Anyone have any better knowledge to confirm or refute either of the above? Quackdave 22:48, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

February 2007 sighting

I saw two Class 31s at Selhurst Depot the other day, one at each end of a NR test train. One was in NR all over yellow, the other was dark blue / black with a red stripe and a nameplate - does anyone know which locomotive the second one was (I'm assuming it was on lease from FM Rail)? Cod 00:17, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Preservation section

I am thinking of moving this to a separate article to match List of preserved British Rail Class 08 locomotives and List of preserved British Rail Class 47 locomotives. Are there any objections? Biscuittin (talk) 21:10, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Please discuss at Talk:List of preserved British Rail Class 47 locomotives. Biscuittin (talk) 20:46, 23 October 2009 (UTC).

Sounds like a very good idea as preservation infor is `News' RATHER TAHN `ENCYCLOPAEDIC'. Barney Bruchstein (talk) 20:52, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Possible change to the title of this article

This article is currently named in accordance the Wikipedia:WikiProject UK Railways naming conventions for British rolling stock allocated a TOPS number. A proposal to change this convention and/or its scope is being discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways#Naming convention, where your comments would be welcome.

Infobox

The "power at rail" of 872 hp looks too low. It is normally about 80% of engine hp so, even with a 1,250 hp engine, I would expect "power at rail" to be 1,000 hp. Biscuittin (talk) 17:06, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

I believe the Mirrlees engines were originally rated at 1,100 hp. Taking 80% of this gives 880 hp which is close to the 872 hp quoted. Mock wurzel soup (talk) 01:05, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Infobox has now been updated to power at rail 1,170 hp which is roughly 80% of 1,470 hp. Mock wurzel soup (talk) 01:17, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on British Rail Class 31. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://todaysrailways.fotopic.net/c1059898.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100626091341/http://mainlinerail.fotopic.net/c1607169.html to http://mainlinerail.fotopic.net/c1607169.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)