This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Brytenwalda edit
No mention of this title in the article seems a little odd. 89.241.50.186 (talk) 15:50, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Forked Article edit
This article was forked out from the Emperor article for edits to the contents of this article before Revision of "British Emperor" as of 12:57, 14 March 2006 by user:Francis Schonken See Revision of "Emperor" as of 22:39, 11 March 2006 by user:Neddyseagoon
This note is so that if there is a copyright issue the text can be tracked back through the Emperor article --Philip Baird Shearer 18:23, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Imperium maius edit
Proposed titles for George III edit
Instead of putting Emperor of the Birtish and Irish and Emperor of the British and Hanoverian Dominions into this article, I would like to create a new one called "Proposed Imperial Titles for George III" or something. How does that sound? CharlesMartel 20:31, 14 May 2006 (UTC)CharlesMartel
- I'd go with just merging the two into this one, it would fit fine in the article as is without creating a seperate article. At any rate the information would just work as well if it were mentioned in the George III article instead of a seperate article. Radagast83 06:56, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Horrible opening paragraph edit
The characterisation British Emperor (or: British Empress), that is: being British and also being Emperor/Empress can only be applied to very few people, as Britain's monarchs are indicated as king or queen (latin: rex/regina) in almost all cases.
My edit is tentative, though, but I felt it would look better than that. Snapdragonfly 11:37, 13 April 2007 (UTC)