Talk:Brigham McCown

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)

As of 5/2014, the page is still a mess edit

This page was started in 2006, written by staffers and, as the edit history shows, narrowly escaped deletion due to WP :AUTO and notability issues twice or more.

As of 5/2014, 8 years later, the article is still a mess. It is highly uninformative. Missing layout, sloppy and largely references and notability treated casually, it reads like a resume. The external links section is unacceptable. If this is not cleaned up speedily, I will tag for deletion.--Wuerzele (talk) 22:14, 11 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

8/6/14 edit

Agree this article should be deleted. It is messy, unsupported, and appears to be inconsistent with policy regarding autobiographies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sandiego42 (talkcontribs) 20:48, 6 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

fixed layout, tagged with citation needs edit

Note: all refs are external links. was there a paid editor involved maybe? Honi soit qui mal y pense. --Wuerzele (talk) 07:49, 12 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Brigham McCown. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:56, 20 January 2018 (UTC)Reply