Talk:Briantspuddle

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dorset Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dorset, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics connected with Dorset. If you would like to participate, you can visit the WikiProject Dorset project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.DorsetWikipedia:WikiProject DorsetTemplate:WikiProject DorsetDorset articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Julian(a) of Norwich edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The most widely used (and, I presume, correct) usage is 'Julian of Norwich.' Hence, I have changed it to this from 'Juliana', by which name she was never referred to. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.166.157.234 (talk) 16:15, 11 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Could whoever who has been making edits on the work I did (Which I generally like very much by the way!), please tell me why they removed the part about life in the village today, with reference to the shop, post office, activities and lack of anything for the youth? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.158.163.77 (talk) 14:33, 3 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Edits

"Like most such villages, it is peopled by a number of second home owners, for whom the properties are capital investments,used for a few weeks a year. Only half a dozen people actually live and work in the village, and in agriculture."

This is POV and as far as I am aware, actually factually incorrect. Please cite a source if you want this material to stay in. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.169.140.18 (talk) 11:53, 14 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic